[analogwzrd]

"Author is modifying the product behavior with their software."

I would say that the end user is modifying the behavior of the hardware, that they own and are fully in control of, by choosing to run software that they purchased. But I'm fully aware that regulatory agencies probably have their own way of thinking about that.

Point taken about how we need some regulations, but isn't everyone sitting in an MBA program right now being trained to identify this exact kind of workaround?

As for displaying a device that isn't certified yet, who's the victim? What's wrong with saying "We can't take orders on this yet, but we're working on getting cool new product certified as fast as possible"? The article said displaying a device, not turning it on.

From your post, it seems like you're painting this guy as a malicious bad actor who going to destroy society when, to me, he seems like someone who's trying to find an efficient way to sell a solution to people who might find it valuable.

[warkdarrior]

> we need some regulations, but isn't everyone sitting in an MBA program right now being trained to identify this exact kind of workaround?

Just because there are some bad actors out there, it does not mean that you should behave the same way.