top | item 40947479

52,000-year-old woolly mammoth chromosomes reconstructed from 'jerky-like' skin

64 points| speckx | 1 year ago |abc.net.au

30 comments

order
[+] lmpdev|1 year ago|reply
I personally think successfully resurrecting the Thylacine and reintroducing it longterm to Tasmania would be a better aim over all these comments on Mammoth cloning

Advantages: - smaller (but still a macro-sized animal) - multiple surrogate options rather than just African Elephants - the ecosystem would be better with its capstone apex predator back - it only died out so recently that it has footage from zoos

[+] VladimirGolovin|1 year ago|reply
Unlike the elephant / mammoth pairing, there aren't any marsupials similar to Thylacine (as far as I know). What surrogate options did you have in mind?
[+] Qem|1 year ago|reply
Is ti possible to do this for the giant ground sloth too, or there is no well preserved DNA sample for it so far?
[+] lofaszvanitt|1 year ago|reply
So it would run amok and climb a skyscraper?
[+] 29athrowaway|1 year ago|reply
It would die immediately due to global warming, or it would be killed for its horns by traditional medicine maniacs. But could be a good source of textiles and perhaps protein. It was a source of protein back in ita day.
[+] fauria|1 year ago|reply
Would it be possible, with today's technology, to clone a woolly mammoth?
[+] cmrdporcupine|1 year ago|reply
I'm more interested in mastodons, their smaller, temperate climate cousins. Fits better with our warmer world. And so cute.

They used to range across this whole (North American) continent. I just giggle at thinking the havoc they'd cause let loose in northeastern forests again.

[+] ourmandave|1 year ago|reply
The caps are melting and some people are all in on bringing back the woolly mammoth.

How about the woolly rhino while we're at it? Maybe open a zoo in Death Valley to house 'em.

[+] saalweachter|1 year ago|reply
The correlation coefficient between # mammoths and ice cap extent is like, r=0.9 over the last 40,000 years.

Obviously we need to bring the mammoths back, if we want to fix the global climate.

[+] falsaberN1|1 year ago|reply
Gotta reproduce that mammoth jerky somehow.
[+] dhosek|1 year ago|reply
Curiously, it turns out that elephants eating fauna actually promotes plant and tree growth. I remember reading something (ca 2007?) about the possibility that reintroducing elephants to the American Southwest could lead to reforestation of areas that are currently desert.

Which, of course, doesn’t really provide good justification for de-extinctifying the mammoth (although as I say this, I wonder if they might acually play a role in preserving the permafrost, as per this recent Science Friday story: https://www.sciencefriday.com/segments/becoming-earth-how-li... )

[+] rkallos|1 year ago|reply
Woolly mammoths were a geoengineer species that have no living proxy. Bringing them back is definitely a controversial project, but there's a case to be made that de-extincting the woolly mammoth could help prevent permafrost from melting.
[+] rezmason|1 year ago|reply
Maybe this is what it'll take to seriously combat global warming. Filling zoos with wooly mammoths, and then extorting us into dropping global temperatures to keep them alive.

Unless we're headed for a Day After Tomorrow situation. Then it might be the mammoths keeping us in zoos

[+] Log_out_|1 year ago|reply
Keeping open options is not madness,even in times of madness. Times change,but the capabilities persist.