I personally think successfully resurrecting the Thylacine and reintroducing it longterm to Tasmania would be a better aim over all these comments on Mammoth cloning
Advantages:
- smaller (but still a macro-sized animal)
- multiple surrogate options rather than just African Elephants
- the ecosystem would be better with its capstone apex predator back
- it only died out so recently that it has footage from zoos
Unlike the elephant / mammoth pairing, there aren't any marsupials similar to Thylacine (as far as I know). What surrogate options did you have in mind?
It would die immediately due to global warming, or it would be killed for its horns by traditional medicine maniacs. But could be a good source of textiles and perhaps protein. It was a source of protein back in ita day.
I'm more interested in mastodons, their smaller, temperate climate cousins. Fits better with our warmer world. And so cute.
They used to range across this whole (North American) continent. I just giggle at thinking the havoc they'd cause let loose in northeastern forests again.
Curiously, it turns out that elephants eating fauna actually promotes plant and tree growth. I remember reading something (ca 2007?) about the possibility that reintroducing elephants to the American Southwest could lead to reforestation of areas that are currently desert.
Which, of course, doesn’t really provide good justification for de-extinctifying the mammoth (although as I say this, I wonder if they might acually play a role in preserving the permafrost, as per this recent Science Friday story: https://www.sciencefriday.com/segments/becoming-earth-how-li... )
Woolly mammoths were a geoengineer species that have no living proxy. Bringing them back is definitely a controversial project, but there's a case to be made that de-extincting the woolly mammoth could help prevent permafrost from melting.
Maybe this is what it'll take to seriously combat global warming. Filling zoos with wooly mammoths, and then extorting us into dropping global temperatures to keep them alive.
Unless we're headed for a Day After Tomorrow situation. Then it might be the mammoths keeping us in zoos
[+] [-] lmpdev|1 year ago|reply
Advantages: - smaller (but still a macro-sized animal) - multiple surrogate options rather than just African Elephants - the ecosystem would be better with its capstone apex predator back - it only died out so recently that it has footage from zoos
[+] [-] VladimirGolovin|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] Qem|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] lofaszvanitt|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] 29athrowaway|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] fauria|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] johncessna|1 year ago|reply
https://colossal.com/mammoth/
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/animals/a42708517/s...
[+] [-] cmrdporcupine|1 year ago|reply
They used to range across this whole (North American) continent. I just giggle at thinking the havoc they'd cause let loose in northeastern forests again.
[+] [-] ourmandave|1 year ago|reply
How about the woolly rhino while we're at it? Maybe open a zoo in Death Valley to house 'em.
[+] [-] saalweachter|1 year ago|reply
Obviously we need to bring the mammoths back, if we want to fix the global climate.
[+] [-] falsaberN1|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dhosek|1 year ago|reply
Which, of course, doesn’t really provide good justification for de-extinctifying the mammoth (although as I say this, I wonder if they might acually play a role in preserving the permafrost, as per this recent Science Friday story: https://www.sciencefriday.com/segments/becoming-earth-how-li... )
[+] [-] rkallos|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] rezmason|1 year ago|reply
Unless we're headed for a Day After Tomorrow situation. Then it might be the mammoths keeping us in zoos
[+] [-] Log_out_|1 year ago|reply