Lol because you’re citing it. A study is not a magic spell you cast to immediately win arguments. Every study makes assumptions and you have to be prepared to discuss and defend them if you cite one. Another basic question, how much energy storage does their model require, because its probably way less that would actually be required. For comparison, this study of Germany found 56 TWh of storage to be optimal assuming a hypothetical and very cheap hydrogen storage system.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4dc8#...
jeffbee|1 year ago
goodSteveramos|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]