top | item 40972147

The oldest known recording of a human voice [video]

172 points| YeGoblynQueenne | 1 year ago |bbc.com | reply

38 comments

order
[+] derektank|1 year ago|reply
Accounting for the variability in the recording medium's speed by including a constant frequency from a tuning fork strikes me as genuinely genius, particularly when he wasn't even thinking about playing back the audio
[+] Cupertino95014|1 year ago|reply
I don't know if this is the oldest recording of a FAMOUS person, but here's Brahms in 1889:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H31q7Qrjjo0

[+] thegrim33|1 year ago|reply
Skip to 3:10 if you just want to hear the voice and not have 3 minutes of preamble.
[+] gelatocar|1 year ago|reply
FWIW I found the whole video quite interesting, I had never really considered that there could be sound recordings from before anyone had thought of a way to play them back. Though I do remember an old mythbusters episode [1] where they tested whether it was possible for audio to be "accidentally" recorded on a pot when a piece of grass happened to mark the pot while spinning.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_(2006_season)#Pott...

[+] nadermx|1 year ago|reply
Thank you for saving me three minutes of my life to only hear some humming
[+] nashashmi|1 year ago|reply
here is a recording from 1885: https://youtu.be/y2z34uYXF5I?t=20

It is a recording in Makkah of the religious leader reciting the Quran.

[+] Loughla|1 year ago|reply
The prayers from the Quran are always so pretty sounding.

If you haven't seen Bab Aziz, do so. Some of the prayers at the holy gathering are absolutely beautiful to listen to.

Literally no idea what they're saying. But pretty though.

[+] radarsat1|1 year ago|reply
This is cool because I've heard the recording before but didn't know the story behind it.

What's funny to me is, looking at that invention design, how crazy this guy must have appeared to his peers, like, "look it writes the sound into the ashes!!!". "Sure Eddy, buddy, let's get you a nice cup of tea and calm down.."

Yet he was on to something amazing that would change how we live.

I suppose there was a "crazy inventor" culture at the time though, with so much new understanding of mechanical physics and engineering developing at a such a rapid pace, so maybe it wasn't so out of place, what a time that must have been to be alive..

[+] retrac|1 year ago|reply
He sold several of them to physicists and linguists. The application to studying sound and speech was pretty obvious. But, eh, I have a background in linguistics and you can squint at waveforms of speech all you want; you don't get too much out of it. Fundamental frequencies for vowels are revealed with some experience at interpretation, but that had been worked out already, by the late 18th century. I suppose it would have helped confirm it.
[+] simmswap|1 year ago|reply
The song sung here ("Au clair du lune") starts with an aptly prophetic verse:

>>By the light of the moon, >>My friend Pierrot, >>Lend me your quill >>To write a word.

[+] mubu|1 year ago|reply
Funnily I found the 1st version more coherent than the one corrected for speed fluctuations.
[+] Moon_Y|1 year ago|reply
Indeed, there is too much noise, and it seems there's nothing worth listening to.
[+] adastra22|1 year ago|reply
It’s quite possible that one day future technology can beat this by feat by 4500 years. That’s when old kingdom Egypt adopted the potter’s wheel and started mass producing religious figures, like little cat figurines. To get more efficient in mass production, they started using reeds to shape clay on the potter wheel to etch features in a way that might reproduce sound waves in the air at the time it was crafted, and maybe, just maybe survived the kiln.

So sitting on the shelves of our museums might be little recordings of a few minutes conversation between workers in an early 25th century BCE Egyptian sweatshop. I would love to someday hear those words!

[+] darby_nine|1 year ago|reply
Sadly the last time I looked into this (though, I suppose I looked at roman pottery) I came to the conclusion that a) this is unlikely to have accidentally occurred and b) their machining would have been unlikely to be up to reliably (re)producing instruments that were able to do this intentionally. Recording voice takes responsiveness to forces a tiny fraction of a percent of, say, a foot pedal controlling part of a lathe.

I'm not saying it's impossible but such a feat intentionally constructed surely would itself be worth recording.

EDIT: clarified tense