I reckon holmium deserved a mention, why is it missing?
To quote Wiki:
"Holmium, like all of the lanthanides, is paramagnetic at standard temperature and pressure. However, holmium is ferromagnetic at temperatures below 19 K (−254.2 °C; −425.5 °F). It has the highest magnetic moment (10.6 μB) of any naturally occurring element and possesses other unusual magnetic properties. When combined with yttrium, it forms highly magnetic compounds."
Very cool, the site's entire 'materials' archives is really interesting as a layman in Materials Science. [0]
This kind of reminded of the sense of wonder of reading through Encarta entries in the late 90's and how I assumed the internet would look like in the future.
That link lists the Piezoelectric Effect near the top. I wondered if there's a corollary for magnetism. I googled the word Piezomagnetic on a whim and was satisfied to find this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezomagnetism
It is quite good. They touch on complex topics but remain understandable and provide sources for further reading. I did not see anything obviously suspect, which is rare in vulgarisation.
Interestingly, the Canadian coins are the same dimensions, but are magnetic. US vending machines used to have a magnet that would deflect Canadian coins into the coin return slot.
When I was growing up near Detroit, merchants took US and Canadian coins interchangeably, and gave both back out as change. But the Post Office was strict about it. I managed to collect a set of King George coins -- at least the smaller ones.
Tungsten carbide is magnetic. I bought a "tungsten" cube from some shoddy Amazon vendor. It's a lot denser than steel, but not as dense as pure tungsten. It is magnetic. The density of the cube is in the range of tungsten carbide.
Pure tungsten carbide is not. You just got some magnetic contaminants in it.
This has is a good test for fake "gold" that can consist of tungsten core with a thin film of gold on top. It's pretty much impossible to get pure tungsten, so such "gold" ends up being magnetic.
The glue to hold the sintered carbide powder is cobalt or iron or whatever pot-metal crap they have on hand for cheap blocks. That would be where the magnetism is coming from. If it's highly magnetic you probably have little tungsten and a lot of binder.
At the microscopic level, what determines whether a given set of valence elections has an excess spin, and thus an excess magnetic moment, is still determined by an empirical set of rules, called Hund's rules, instead of from first principles, iirc:
So aluminum and copper are listed as not magnetic yet powerful magnets are used to separate them from non metallic materials in recycling? Seems like a semantic argument.
That kind of phrasing usually indicates someone doesn't understand or is rejecting a meaningful and useful distinction. Is that what you intended to do here?
The article seems to be pretty clear about how there are several different types of magnetism that can be exhibited by materials, and appropriately classifies various materials. Nothing about the existence or mechanism of eddy current separators is a counterexample to anything in the article.
There are very specific about including 'metals' in every statement.
Yep, paramagnetic non metals are: Oxygen (commonly shown on youtube), Nitric Oxide, Boron, Sulfur and some graphites (very slight) due to delocalised electrons.
Iron exists in many different crystal structures in different kinds of steels. Some of these forms are magnetic, others are not. When you work the metal, such as by bending it, you can cause it to change from one structure to another.
304 is an austenitic stainless steel, and austenite is non-magnetic. But when it's cold worked, it turns into martensite, which is harder and magnetic. If you anneal it by heating it and letting it cool, it turns back into austenite.
Not a physicist, but I’d guess that bending the metal causes it to heat up, which in turn could make it easier for electrons to align and respond to magnetic waves.
[+] [-] hilbert42|1 year ago|reply
To quote Wiki:
"Holmium, like all of the lanthanides, is paramagnetic at standard temperature and pressure. However, holmium is ferromagnetic at temperatures below 19 K (−254.2 °C; −425.5 °F). It has the highest magnetic moment (10.6 μB) of any naturally occurring element and possesses other unusual magnetic properties. When combined with yttrium, it forms highly magnetic compounds."
[+] [-] DoingIsLearning|1 year ago|reply
This kind of reminded of the sense of wonder of reading through Encarta entries in the late 90's and how I assumed the internet would look like in the future.
[0] https://sciencenotes.org/category/chemistry/materials/
[+] [-] rkagerer|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] kergonath|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] FrankWilhoit|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] analog31|1 year ago|reply
When I was growing up near Detroit, merchants took US and Canadian coins interchangeably, and gave both back out as change. But the Post Office was strict about it. I managed to collect a set of King George coins -- at least the smaller ones.
[+] [-] barelyauser|1 year ago|reply
[0]. https://youtu.be/7ZeBWJLRXqM&t=1231
[+] [-] m463|1 year ago|reply
https://www.capturedlightning.com/frames/interesting1.html
Don't know if the copper figures into the shrinking...
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] bediger4000|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] cyberax|1 year ago|reply
Pure tungsten carbide is not. You just got some magnetic contaminants in it.
This has is a good test for fake "gold" that can consist of tungsten core with a thin film of gold on top. It's pretty much impossible to get pure tungsten, so such "gold" ends up being magnetic.
[+] [-] foobarian|1 year ago|reply
I would certainly be surprised if they could manufacture a pure cube (> 99.9%) for the price they sell it at :-)
[+] [-] mianos|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] rowanG077|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mjfl|1 year ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hund%27s_rules
[+] [-] csours|1 year ago|reply
Iron Nitrides
[+] [-] ChrisMarshallNY|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ChrisMarshallNY|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] SigmundA|1 year ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_current_separator
[+] [-] wtallis|1 year ago|reply
That kind of phrasing usually indicates someone doesn't understand or is rejecting a meaningful and useful distinction. Is that what you intended to do here?
The article seems to be pretty clear about how there are several different types of magnetism that can be exhibited by materials, and appropriately classifies various materials. Nothing about the existence or mechanism of eddy current separators is a counterexample to anything in the article.
[+] [-] colanderman|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dvh|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mianos|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mankyd|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] m463|1 year ago|reply
I also wonder about "sorting" atoms/molecules like Maxwell's demon:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_demon
[+] [-] bsmith89|1 year ago|reply
> 304 stainless steel isn’t normally magnetic, but it becomes partially ferromagnetic if it’s bent at room temperature.
Anyone have a lay-person explanation for this?
[+] [-] Tuna-Fish|1 year ago|reply
304 is an austenitic stainless steel, and austenite is non-magnetic. But when it's cold worked, it turns into martensite, which is harder and magnetic. If you anneal it by heating it and letting it cool, it turns back into austenite.
[+] [-] koolba|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] RavingGoat|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]