(no title)
jac241 | 1 year ago
Unfortunately this dataset doesn't include the, probably more frequent, severe TBIs. Surely wouldn't take many patients for the cost of a hemicraniectomy, 2 week neuro-ICU stay, trach/peg, and long term acute care stay to equal the cost of a few measures to slow drivers down. Not to mention lost earning/tax potential. Too bad it's not from the same budget.
Wear your seatbelt and a helmet and hopefully you can avoid the pain of your family having to have a surprise end-of-life discussion with me.
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
CalRobert|1 year ago
RecycledEle|1 year ago
Maybe they would interfere with looking over your shoulder.
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
astral303|1 year ago
ndsipa_pomu|1 year ago
sbarre|1 year ago
Bluestrike2|1 year ago
Wider travel lanes on normal streets? More signalized intersections with overrides for emergency services instead of roundabouts, stop signs, or other measures meant to decrease intersection accidents and fatalities? Removal of speed bumps, raised pedestrian crosswalks, etc.? Additional lanes so ambulances have space to pass other cars?
Sure, they could all ostensibly improve ambulance travel times. But they'd do so by dramatically increasing the number of fatalities on our streets. Not to mention the workload on those same emergency services. So while it can make sense to consider the impact on those services, they probably shouldn't be the driving factor. Or even a main one.
On the other hand, even if speed bumps and other measures cause minor delays, other changes might be able to balance them out. Dedicated bus lanes, for example, are basically exclusive express lanes you could choose to route emergency service vehicles down with potentially significant time savings.
nephanth|1 year ago
And if there isn't one, your problem isn't traffic calming, your problem is the lack of bus lane
iftheshoefitss|1 year ago
RIP fr fr