(no title)
MilStdJunkie | 1 year ago
I'm reminded of how you have to use `{empty}` character refs in lightweight markup like Asciidoc to "hold your place" in a list, in case you need the first element in the list to be an admonition or block. Like so:
. {empty}
+
WARNING: Don't catch yourself on fire!
+
Pour the gasoline.
And the equivalent XML which would be something like <procedure>
<step>
<warning> Don't catch yourself on fire!</warning>
<para>Pour the gasoline.</para>
</step>
</procedure>
This is one of those rare cases where the XML is more elegant than the lightweight markup. That hack with `{empty}` bugs me.Anyways, I'm spitballing that these old-timey nulls I'm seeing are being employed in an equivalent way, some sort of internal bespoke workaround to a format restriction.
No comments yet.