top | item 4103157 (no title) kyebosh | 13 years ago Apparently "gay" & "retarded" are horribly offensive & insensitive descriptors, but "lame" is ok. Who knew? discuss order hn newest MiguelHudnandez|13 years ago I suggest it's because it's not commonly used today for its actual definition.People don't normally refer to themselves or people they love as "lame." Not so for "gay" or "retarded."A modern equivalent of "lame" might be "handicapped," even though it is not as specific.
MiguelHudnandez|13 years ago I suggest it's because it's not commonly used today for its actual definition.People don't normally refer to themselves or people they love as "lame." Not so for "gay" or "retarded."A modern equivalent of "lame" might be "handicapped," even though it is not as specific.
MiguelHudnandez|13 years ago
People don't normally refer to themselves or people they love as "lame." Not so for "gay" or "retarded."
A modern equivalent of "lame" might be "handicapped," even though it is not as specific.