[tugberkk]

We should give a damn. As you said, anyone can publish anything on the internet, how would we know whether it is valid or not?

Peer-review is important. I know it is not working great, but it is working to some degree.

[carlosjobim]

I don't agree with even the concept of peer review. Reality is the only deciding factor in what is true or not, which is discovered in real world testing and not by asking somebody with a title.

[tugberkk]

It is very hard to do testing on theoretical side of things. It is also possible to cheat on experimental results. On top of that, it eliminates the possibility of redoing (or publishing previously done results) if there is no significant contribution.

I think academic publishing is not in a good place right now and should be improved, but I don't personally see any problem with the concept. Thank you for your insights on the matter.