top | item 41033094 (no title) coffeeri | 1 year ago I think they are not referring to ls, but to exa [0], which is not maintained anymore.[0]https://github.com/ogham/exa discuss order hn newest Izkata|1 year ago No, they definitely mean "ls":> By deliberately making some decisions differently, eza attempts to be a more featureful, more user-friendly version of ls. coffeeri|1 year ago Yes, it is marketed as a better “ls”. I was commenting regarding “maintained” in:> A modern, maintained replacement for ls.“Maintained” is referring to exa I think. load replies (2) cafkafk|1 year ago We do not load replies (1)
Izkata|1 year ago No, they definitely mean "ls":> By deliberately making some decisions differently, eza attempts to be a more featureful, more user-friendly version of ls. coffeeri|1 year ago Yes, it is marketed as a better “ls”. I was commenting regarding “maintained” in:> A modern, maintained replacement for ls.“Maintained” is referring to exa I think. load replies (2) cafkafk|1 year ago We do not load replies (1)
coffeeri|1 year ago Yes, it is marketed as a better “ls”. I was commenting regarding “maintained” in:> A modern, maintained replacement for ls.“Maintained” is referring to exa I think. load replies (2)
Izkata|1 year ago
> By deliberately making some decisions differently, eza attempts to be a more featureful, more user-friendly version of ls.
coffeeri|1 year ago
> A modern, maintained replacement for ls.
“Maintained” is referring to exa I think.
cafkafk|1 year ago