(no title)
ralph_r | 1 year ago
There are however many other contexts where I would argue speed and a simple UX makes a big difference.
* Notes that need to be taken on the fly: class notes, lab notes, field observations, general notes
* Prototyping, brainstorming, ideation sessions, especially collaborative ones
* Drafting outlines
* Creating presentations on work you've already completed
* Doing schoolwork, such as assignments or lab reports
* Creating teaching material on content material you're a subject matter expert in
That's a few examples but there are plenty more. The goal isn't to rush the scientific process. The goal is to have a tool that doesn't get in your way and enables speed-of-thought writing for science. This can be helpful in many ways, especially for students, but also for scientists.
ted_dunning|1 year ago
That is, stempad is a blow against artificially slow writing, not against all slow writing.
It ideally doesn't keep you from thinking deeply and may help if it lets you avoid thinking about the tool instead of the content.
rrnechmech|1 year ago
This is really well put
Impediments not deliberate choice
rrnechmech|1 year ago
Speed is definitely a good thing sometimes.
Note: Maybe you could play it "both ways" and have a "flow", or focus or no distraction mode?
cl3misch|1 year ago
During my Master's or PhD I would have agreed with the "slow science" sentiments here. These days I want to get things done and work with collaborators.