top | item 41116591

(no title)

justusw | 1 year ago

Funny that you mention it, I also went Homebrew -> MacPorts -> Nix. Homebrew had analytics and broke versions too often. MacPorts is way more stable, but some niche packages would not build well, and I had terminfo issues with tmux.

Nix allows me to override most of that, and I can share home manager config with my Debian workstation.

discuss

order

wredue|1 year ago

For the life of me, I will never understand how developers, of all people, see “just take ownership of system directories, which we will relentlessly pollute” as acceptable behavior for homebrew.

Flabbergasted.

woodruffw|1 year ago

I don't think this is a fair characterization: on Intel, Homebrew uses `/usr/local`, which Apple has (historically) left empty as a location for non-OS managed software to be placed. To my understanding, this is an artifact of macOS's partial BSD ancestry. On ARM-based Macs, Homebrew uses `/opt` to avoid even this confusion (a trait it shares with other non-OS software but administrative-type software).

On the other hand, if Homebrew used `/usr` by default, this would be a fair characterization. But it doesn't.

RandomThoughts3|1 year ago

The really shameful behaviour at the time was that if you changed it (which you theorically could), some packages were so poorly written than they just broke and homebrew just warned you it was going to be this way instead of actually fixing the issue.