top | item 41123186

(no title)

hlandau | 1 year ago

foobar2000 is so good, and so unmatched, especially with its plugins ecosystem, I use it for my music playback needs under wine on Linux.

discuss

order

RunSet|1 year ago

Foobar2000 is parasitic in the sense that many of the plugins that give foobar2000 its value are open-source ports of open-source software, yet the foobar2000 software that hosts the plugins is proprietary.

Feels like when Disney makes a movie version of a public domain folktale and then lobbies to perpetually extend the copyright on it.

jdc0589|1 year ago

plugins were great. Measured the speakers at my desk (I built them). generated an inverse impulse response filter, and fed it through a plugin to do full frequency equalization. It was a fun project to play with full range speakers that had no passive filter network whatsoever, all done via software.

anthk|1 year ago

Meh. Audacious + pulseaudio/alsa-plugins >>>>> foobar 2000.

That for GUI.

If you like CLI, mpd+any UI it's a beast. Mocp if you are a minimalist.

hlandau|1 year ago

The problem (at least for me) is input format support.

Assorted foobar2000 plugins support every obscure tracker format, every obscure video game music format (.vgz, etc.), and then foo_midi lets you render MIDIs not just with Soundfonts but with whatever VSTi DLLs you like. Also support for music files in ZIP files as well as music files in ZIP files in ZIP files (don't ask). That's hard to compete with.