(no title)
StopTheWorld | 1 year ago
Is there any evidence of any tribes whatsoever existing over 20,000 years ago? All the evidence points against it.
There was no tribal violence 47,000 years ago because there were no tribes!
StopTheWorld | 1 year ago
Is there any evidence of any tribes whatsoever existing over 20,000 years ago? All the evidence points against it.
There was no tribal violence 47,000 years ago because there were no tribes!
defrost|1 year ago
And all the other aboriginal sites across Australia that are older than 20,000 years.
And the sites tracking back toward Africa that line the human expansion outwards.
What kind of world do you live in that has denied you access to evidence of early human existence?
StopTheWorld|1 year ago
I didn't say humans didn't exist 20,000 years ago, I said there was no tribal violence. There's no evidence the Jaburara were organized as a tribe 40,000 years ago, although later on that may have happened.
linearrust|1 year ago
Hunter gatherer tribes.
> There was no tribal violence 47,000 years ago because there were no tribes!
Unless you are arguing semantics, yes there were. Tribes and tribal violence.
StopTheWorld|1 year ago
Hunter gatherer bands. There's no evidence of any tribes 20,000 years ago.
> Unless you are arguing semantics, yes there were. Tribes and tribal violence.
There is no evidence of any tribes existing 47,000 years ago. Insofar as tribes, and tribal violence, the OP mentioned them, which is wrong in that time frame, semantics or not.