(no title)
alphanumeric0 | 1 year ago
It's funny that it was considered a pseudoscience for such a long time, when there's lot of clinical applications outside of trying to live longer. For me, as someone with celiac disease, I know the age of my intestines are probably older than most people, after constant damage from gluten. It'd be nice to have a cell reprogramming treatment for intestines.
shiroiushi|1 year ago
sharpshadow|1 year ago
I’ve heard that it is possible to let grow one type of animal inside another’s animal womb is that true, any sources?
1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29717842/
2. https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/05/06/1092055/scientis...
rob74|1 year ago
adrianN|1 year ago
rob74|1 year ago
That's probably the reason why it's taken more seriously now (and not just by venture capitalists hoping to live forever): by now, all Western societies have population ageing problems. Due to better medicine, people live longer, but their actual productive lives are still comparatively short because of age-related diseases like dementia, increasing physical frailty etc. Plus, not enough children are born so the working population can sustain the elderly. So, even if the goal is not (yet) "living forever", societies are now more interested in at least tackling age-related diseases. Not sure if that will significantly increase life span, but it might still be an improvement.