top | item 41163570

(no title)

mugwumprk | 1 year ago

The irony to me is that he just voted to overturn the Chevron doctrine. There's no way that doesn't lead to a huge increase in the number of laws.

discuss

order

JumpCrisscross|1 year ago

> irony to me is that he just voted to overturn the Chevron doctrine. There's no way that doesn't lead to a huge increase in the number of laws

In only the most technical sense. Practically speaking, reducing the set of restrictions from laws, narrowly-constructed rules and broadly-constructed rules to just the first two will reduce restrictions. (I personally believe most of those restrictions are valid. But there are good arguments for and against Chevron.)

InTheArena|1 year ago

Read the article, it also calls out regulations, and the growth of guidance documents.