top | item 41164549

(no title)

jafo1989 | 1 year ago

>I get so tired of seeing content saying, 'Oh, if you just saved a little more, if you just invested a little more…' Like, no – people are on the edge. People cannot afford to live, to eat, to put gas in their cars," Brama says.

>That's partly why Brama now splits her time between the United States and Europe

I wish I was broke enough to split time between two continents.

discuss

order

nrfulton|1 year ago

"There is a leisure class at both ends of the economic spectrum."

But even setting that aside, the article goes on to mention Albania (low CoL) and access to healthcare. The latter, in particular, checks out. I have great insurance, but my out-of-pocket max equals somewhere between 5 and 10 round-trips to Europe. It's not hard to imagine there exist people who can setup the circumstances such that working in the USA part of the year and living somewhere else part of the year is massively more economical than staying in the USA.

Actually, doesn't that exact situation describe a huge fraction of the US agricultural labor force?

janalsncm|1 year ago

For reference, I calculated that for the same per-day cost as I have in the US I could live in a five star hotel in Thailand. And when you factor in the cost of rent, international flights aren’t as expensive as you might think.

I see this less as how inexpensive things are elsewhere and more how excessively expensive they are in the US. In the Bay Area for example the housing stock is incredibly expensive but relatively low quality even compared with other US cities.

jltsiren|1 year ago

Travel is cheap if you don't have to pay for accommodation. Flying a few times a year between Europe and the US is definitely cheaper than renting in the US.

strictnein|1 year ago

Sure, but if you're not having to pay rent, why fly at all? Why not stay put and save that money?

throwaheyy|1 year ago

That stuck out glaringly for me too.