I think love has to be a state that can be worked towards. We wonder the earth (with apps) looking for that perfect person, today. But did noone fall in love in the past, when you had to make do with people from your own village?
I skimmed the article, so maybe that's why I didn't get it. But isn't the headline misleading? They didn't fall in love and there is no indication that doing all of what they did would make someone fall in love - that otherwise wouldn't have in the first place, no?
What we really need for this is on-screen cameras, so you can actually look someone in the eye. Now, you only look them in the eye when you look away from them at the camera. And when you look them in the eye you're just looking at their mouth.
Ultimately it will likely be easier to simulate eye-contact with live restyling – that is, synthesizing the view from a virtual 'camera' using one or more other cameras nearby – than physically hide a true camera inside a monitor. (Simulation could also signal eye-contact with any point on the screen, not just a single camera location.)
Nvidia, Apple, & others already have software for this, which will only get better.
We’ve needed this – easy, direct eye contact – for quite a long time. I keep waiting for someone to develop it. I think that Apple has a relevant patent, but I don’t know how much content is in the patent, and I’ve never heard that Apple has done anything with it.
I remember a Microsoft research paper that just digitally altered the iris and pupil to be facing towards the camera. I think this tech also exists in iPhones for FaceTime.
To the people worried about their data being sent to google or whatever (I'm not sure what they're actually worried about) -- the extraction of your eyes is done client side, using a seemingly very well made ML model running on Tensorflow which fits in under 15mb.
The feed of your camera is transmitted "directly" to the person you're looking at (well, no, not really directly, it uses WebRTC, so your data passes through Neal's TURN server, but do you really think Neal wants to take care of properly storing your data and handing it off to advertisers?)
It's the eyebrow-inclination detection that really makes this a work of art. Being able to turn a serious stare into a serious aspect ratio is power I didn't know I needed.
For the shy and curious, you can use OBS as a virtual webcam. This is a good option. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekQHJX9rMp8. Guy keeps winking at me and then rolling his eyes when the video doesn't respond.
This site wants to share your cookies to at least 662 “venders” and they are being dishonest with the “legitimate interest” scam. The creator clearly does not care about nor respect their users/visitors.
[+] [-] lambdaba|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] latexr|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] jimnotgym|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] 7bit|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] miguelxt|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] thornewolf|1 year ago|reply
his previous project (infinite craft) was one of the first things i ever heard people talk about wrt LLMs.
His skill is in execution. I think he finds inspiration from the people around him.
[+] [-] namanyayg|1 year ago|reply
Plus, his implementation in a few of them is really exhaustive and polished. Are there any "interns" helping him?
[+] [-] amitlevy49|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] YounoYouno|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] tharakam|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] brikym|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] IncreasePosts|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] gojomo|1 year ago|reply
Nvidia, Apple, & others already have software for this, which will only get better.
[+] [-] jbullock35|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] qingcharles|1 year ago|reply
https://www.androidauthority.com/under-display-selfie-camera...
[+] [-] codezero|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] davedx|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] pcranaway|1 year ago|reply
The feed of your camera is transmitted "directly" to the person you're looking at (well, no, not really directly, it uses WebRTC, so your data passes through Neal's TURN server, but do you really think Neal wants to take care of properly storing your data and handing it off to advertisers?)
[+] [-] hazn|1 year ago|reply
* all people had brown eyes
* all went for funny looks immediately
* 3 of them were shocked and left
[+] [-] dhruvagga|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] petargyurov|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] namanyayg|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] BHSPitMonkey|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] drdrey|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] noman-land|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] diimdeep|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] yesbut|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] xandrius|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] vzaliva|1 year ago|reply
Given, the different people require different levels of privacy.
[+] [-] arendtio|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] _the_inflator|1 year ago|reply
On a meta-level, this is the essence of social engineering: creating a seemingly harmless and fun distraction to get what you may really want.
"Consent to give me pictures of your face and movements" as a pop-up would probably spoil the fun a bit.
[+] [-] archerx|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] colejhudson|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] muppetman|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] jsyang00|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] moralestapia|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] chuckSu|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] fragmede|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unsupp0rted|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] darajava|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] petepete|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] namanyayg|1 year ago|reply
I just see a black screen with "Eyes from $LOCATION" under it.
[+] [-] zikduruqe|1 year ago|reply
*for those that aren't familiar with Worldcoin.... https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/07/technology/worldcoin-iris...
[+] [-] bot0047|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] bun_terminator|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ferguu_|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] umeshram|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] MaxikCZ|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dbg31415|1 year ago|reply