Apartheid is the word used to describe practices and policies where one racial group dominates the other. Having legislators or other occupation of the oppressed racial group does not free you from label.
There are famous historic examples of apartheid where the suppressed racial groups had plenty of opportunities as well as seat at the legislator. This includes the Jim Crow South, Apartheid South Africa, and even Rhodesia.
Apartheid is the word used by most people all over the world, including by several countries, international organizations, and even the ICJ. Now it can be argued that the apartheid only extends to the occupied territories (including East Jerusalem), however I—as do many people—would consider that a distinction without a difference, (it is also arguable whether that is true).
> A multi-ethnic society would be the end of the Jews
This is a racist, anti-Arab belief. Unless I’m misunderstanding, you are generalizing over a whole population of people that they are all intolerant, and cannot share society with other people.
runarberg|1 year ago
There are famous historic examples of apartheid where the suppressed racial groups had plenty of opportunities as well as seat at the legislator. This includes the Jim Crow South, Apartheid South Africa, and even Rhodesia.
Apartheid is the word used by most people all over the world, including by several countries, international organizations, and even the ICJ. Now it can be argued that the apartheid only extends to the occupied territories (including East Jerusalem), however I—as do many people—would consider that a distinction without a difference, (it is also arguable whether that is true).
> A multi-ethnic society would be the end of the Jews
This is a racist, anti-Arab belief. Unless I’m misunderstanding, you are generalizing over a whole population of people that they are all intolerant, and cannot share society with other people.
racional|1 year ago
[deleted]
UIUC_06|1 year ago
[deleted]