[dcraciun]

The other product is a full SaaS boilerplate filled with components and docs, and rightly so, they have more to offer which is why they are more expensive.

However, I argue that more is not always better for a boilerplate product, because more boilerplate = more confusion and unnecessary abstractions which can confine the user to using specific technologies.

My product aims to do the bare minimum to configure all of the important parts of your full stack Next.js app without any extra boilerplate.

[jrflowers]

In English if you say that you are saving 6x more it implies you’ve multiplied a non-zero number (the amount of savings before switching) by six. You clearly want to communicate that your product is 1/6th the cost, with a savings of $250. If the $250 savings is six times what the customer was already saving, then they would have already been saving $250/6, or ~$41.67 by using the other software you described.

It is 1/6 cost not 6x savings.

[dcraciun]

I guess the english wasn't too clear, I do think it's quite concise though and I will think of another way to convey the same message while keeping it concise.

Thanks for explaining this, I will look into it and change the copy using your advice.