(no title)
Wonnk13 | 1 year ago
I'm open to other ideas, but I have to imagine some of this is due to changes in our environment and food supply. plastics everywhere, pesticides in our food, pollution in the air.
Wonnk13 | 1 year ago
I'm open to other ideas, but I have to imagine some of this is due to changes in our environment and food supply. plastics everywhere, pesticides in our food, pollution in the air.
dev_throw|1 year ago
Dig1t|1 year ago
mharig|1 year ago
[deleted]
cracrecry|1 year ago
My personal opinion is mandated flame retardants in foams, mattresses and cushions and other plastics. Smokers die less from fire but everybody else breath poison.
timr|1 year ago
That said, the pop media (of which Scientific American is part) routinely conflates rates of diagnosis with rates of late-stage cancer, even though they're very different, and there's a discrepancy between them. I don't know about colon cancer in particular, but I know that it's been a long-term trend in many different cancers -- for example (iirc) skin cancer -- that people are getting diagnosed far more often, but death rates due to the illness are essentially constant.
This tells you either that we're getting worse at treating what we diagnose, or more plausibly, that we're not detecting things that would lead to death.
moritzwarhier|1 year ago
Why not microplastics, fine particle pollution, noise (urban living around lots of cars and/or heavy industry), mental stress, lack of sleep, lack of healthy connections, lack of time outdoors and healthy exercise, and similar things?
Seems weird to me to pick one arbitrary class of chemicals when all of the things I listed have been worsening.
cancerboi|1 year ago
I have a very rare type of cancer and this particular type of cancer has increased in numbers for young men.
jlcx|1 year ago
AnonMessiah|1 year ago
lambdaba|1 year ago
[1] https://www.bc.edu/bc-web/schools/morrissey/departments/biol...
manmal|1 year ago
candiddevmike|1 year ago
hypeatei|1 year ago
nielsbot|1 year ago
I think the ultimate lesson will be "we're one with the environment, not, in fact, a separate entity from it".
ein0p|1 year ago
francisofascii|1 year ago
ronnier|1 year ago
lovethevoid|1 year ago
Note there aren't any studies specifically about triathletes, only that with proper training, diet, and prevention as most higher level athletes get (uni, olympian, etc), there's no serious risk of DNA damage. Also short course triathletes face more risks generally speaking, at least for cardiac and gastrointestinal issues (not all being chronic, so there's no direct link to cancer here either).
Sleep issues are another area usually ignored since people believe they can't do anything about their sleep issues. I doubt most people are even getting good sleep, in the current ecosystem of always being available.
Additionally, due to the general availability of office work, more people are suffering from gastrointestinal issues than before. This causes us to be sedentary for long periods of time, but we believe ourselves to be "active" because we go for a run on the treadmill. I wouldn't say this really applies to you as a lifelong athlete, only that these extremes (sitting for hours, then rapid exercise, then back to sitting for hours) likely has unintended consequences.
Just some ideas.