[halfjoking]

[flagged]

[randerson]

This was a trend even before COVID. Data linked by the article is almost entirely pre-COVID.

[kccoder]

Not obviously. For example, from ninininino's comment in this post:

For anyone actually wanting real probabilities, a quick google on colorectal which the article mentions as the most common cancer for young men:

"For example, 1 out of every 333,000 15-to-19-year-olds developed colorectal cancer in 1999. Colorectal cancer became more common by 2020, when 1 out of every 77,000 teens"

--

Pretty difficult to blame a vaccine that wasn't in use yet for a 4.32x increase in colorectal cancer rates in teens.

[jfdbcv]

> Secondly, I became convinced Trump had to be using some type of an advanced intuitive capacity, as, based on the information that would have been available to Trump at the time the decisions were made, I could not see any other way to explain how he’d made some of the choices he made. [0]

Why are you reading an unironic Donald Trump mega glazer?

[0]: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/catalyst-events-and-the-t...

[Vitamin_Sushi]

The rate of incidents in GP's article show a large increase in the 90s.

Are you insinuating that covid vaccinees were available to the public at the time?

[halfjoking]

No I’m saying the rate of incidents in GP article are fraudulent.

They are covering for the drastic, sudden increase in cancers from the Covid vaxx by pushing misinformation it’s been increasing since the 90s. If you follow EthicalSkeptic you’ll see a ton of ways they rig the stats:

https://x.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1794022026178421023