[flavius29663]

> the opinion [1] seems to indicate that the geofence itself is not admissible, but evidence obtained as a result of it is still admissible

That means they can geofence to get a short list of suspects, and then file proper warrants for some of them if they have more clues?

[burkaman]

Not anymore, now that this precedent is set.

[ticviking]

I'm still wondering how this precedent prevents parallel construction nonsense