[justneedaname]

I don't subscribe to this take either. As the partner of someone with a server nut allergy why should we be restricted to only eating food we have prepared? Restaurants have to be able to cope with catering to common allergies, it's really not hard. Some people / establishments just don't seem to take it seriously though, like when a flight attendant told my partner she would be fine to eat the snacks they handed out and that they didn't contain nuts... the bag of roasted corn and nuts...

[crazygringo]

> Restaurants have to be able to cope with catering to common allergies, it's really not hard.

To the contrary, it's actually extremely hard.

When I order, I probably get something incorrect ~10% of the time. Whether fine dining or fast food.

To deal with life-threatening allergies, you need to get that error rate down from 10% to, what, 0.000001% or something?

You're literally asking for hospital- and pharmacy-level procedures, controls, and training. Which would make restaurants far more expensive and there would be far less of them.

Not impossible, but yes extremely hard, when servers mix up orders and cooks mix up tickets and runners mix up plates and tables.

[justneedaname]

A procedure I’ve been impressed with is that as soon as you disclose an allergy, the manager will come over with the massive allergen booklet, help take your order and then go and feed that back to the kitchen straight away.

Of course it gets to a point of diminishing returns where you can only rule out so much if the risk but all it should take is proper labelling of ingredients in dishes and training to make sure these processes are followed.

As the other commenter noted, only dishes for those with an allergen need to be prepared separately

[BobaFloutist]

They don't need to make all the food with that level of accuracy, only meals called out as necessarily allergy free.

Restaurants have specific procedures for allergy meals. It's not that hard to do an extra good job when someone discloses an allergy.