So I'm trying to understand. Is this spam for the Lamucal service? I saw this same code posted on Reddit the other day under a different name. Here are a few repos with the exact same code under different names:
- Push novelty (but unusable to most people) code to new Github repo
- Submit that code to Reddit/Hacker News
- People see it and are impressed by the novelty code,
despite not running it due to missing the models themselves, etc. They upvote and subscribe ($$$) to actually try it.
- Repeat
I understand the desire to promote one's new service, and the product seems like it could be interesting, but this is not the way to get the word out. Reputation matters.
Edit:
Check out the user deeplover's post/comment history. One submission with the MicroMusic (see above) repo, and one comment, see below.
This is really strange. I'd rather not name names in case I'm wrong, but some of the comments in this thread that link to "things they made" on Lamucal are by very fishy accounts. Account was made a few months ago, only has four comments on seemingly random articles, the comments are either extremely brief or seemingly ChatGPT-generated, then after months of inactivity they pop up in this thread. Not usually one to complain about this but with your comment showing all the other times this has popped up it's way too strange.
I am an entrepreneur, and my startup team is about to fail. In response to the questions raised by rwl4, I am very sorry. All the features on our website are completely free for everyone to use. If we can help some people, it will be a small consolation for the team before the failure. I apologize again.
That other, probably-related Hacker News user posted a response to a suicide crisis post that looks like a "four-paragraph standard ChatGPT response", complete with a "Lastly, " at the end. I hope that wasn't done just to increase that account's seeming legitimacy because wow, what incredibly bad taste.
As an entrepreneur, doing this kind of not-so-glorious thing to promote my own features, I already feel quite pathetic about myself. Being pointed out by rwl4, I can also take a deep breath. I would like to apologize to the people who have been disturbed, and also apologize to the platform.
> We propose the use of a high-resolution piano transcription model to train a new guitar transcription model. The resulting model obtains state-of-the-art transcription results on GuitarSet in a zero-shot context, improving on previously published methods.
The "tabs" seem to be arpeggiations of the chords, which might have been some use if the chord detection had worked well, which doesn't seem the case. I see chords and tabs being generated from sections which have only spoken audio, while actual guitar parts are not notated at all. The arpeggios are not consistent either and switch arbitrarily to upstrokes/downstrokes and back to arpeggios.
I tried to get it to generate tabs for Where is my Mind by the Pixies. I see the chords, but get the NO icon (red circle with diagonal bar) when I try to click on tabs. Am I doing something wrong?
A couple of weeks ago I asked one of the AIs to teach me this song. It responded that it can't teach specifics or tell me strumming patterns because it would be a copyright violation. I told it that if I went to a human teacher, they would have no problem teaching me how to play along to the song. That was a good enough argument to get the AI to changed its mind (whatever that means) and produced a chord chart and strumming pattern (which was wrong).
It’s a weird technicality of copyright law. When a human teacher plays a song that is a private performance of a composition. When a computer plays a song copyright law treats this as a mechanical copy of the composition and public performance of the composition. When a computer displays musical notation for a composition that is also a mechanical copy.
Private performance of a composition is permitted under copyright law. Creating a mechanical copy and making a public performance requires a licence from a copyright owner and so without that licence there is, in the eyes of copyright law, a breach of copyright.
Off topic, but you may enjoy this guy's cover and hopefully get some pointers on how to play it as well. Although he definitely plays it differently than most
Very happy to see more tools like this. There is so much potential for interactive tabs and sheet music with YouTube videos.
I only found out about https://www.soundslice.com recently. I'm not sure how it managed to evade me for years of searching for music resources on the internet... but for anyone interested in sheet music, I can't recommend it enough.
The design of the whole platform is so minimal and beautiful, and having notation synchronized with YouTube is simply brilliant. Built by one of the co-creators of Django, too!
I played around a few minutes with the various features. The voice removing was kind of impressive, though I don't know how novel that is.
I tried making some AI covers, too, which was kind of fun. For one of my tries, I submitted Nirvana's Smells Like Teen Spirit for AI voice generation to make a cover of Carola's song "Främling" (Sweden's ESC song 1983 which came in third, a very non-Nirvana-type of song). At first, I thought the voice sounded pretty much like a Swedish Kurt Cobain, then the more I listened to it, all I could hear was the Swedish artist Nordman, and it dawned upon me that they have similar voice styles. I tried lowering the pitch, and then I was certain I recognised the voice from another artist but couldn't place it. So I'm leaning towards the AI voices being trained on some not-so-unfamiliar artists rather than there being some cool AI magic happening, though I'm out of my depth here.
I am an entrepreneur, and my startup team is about to fail. In response to the questions raised by rwl4, I am very sorry. All the features on our website are completely free for everyone to use. If we can help some people, it will be a small consolation for the team before the failure. I apologize again.
Pretty cool! Is there a way to either detect or enforce alternate tunings? There is a world beyond EADGBe... I put in a few songs that I know of which have trivial chord fingerings in drop D, and it comes up with some correct but convoluted chord fingerings in standard tuning.
This is going to save me a lot of time for when I actually have time to play music. Much better than whipping out Audacity and its chord estimation, manually grabbing a video etc.
Seems like a cool concept, but the tab function was more or less useless. Tried a bunch of different songs in various complexities, couldn't get anything convincing.
Thank you for your concern! We take copyright and legal issues very seriously. Our platform employs strict copyright protection measures to ensure that all generated content complies with relevant laws and regulations. We use technical means to prevent unauthorized use and encourage users to respect original works. If you have any copyright-related questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us, and we will address them promptly.
but was somewhat disappointed. The site is cool, can give you a headstart when transposing a song to practice, but the chords were quite off in a few examples I tried.
Aren't those completely different? As rwl4 pointed out, your only submission was also about this product, so probably you're trying to promote it, but shouldn't you at least pick a case where it works well?
The mid-range is eerily close to Taylor's voice - there were moments when I almost thought it was really her singing.
But, If you listen closely, you can still catch a tiny hint of that robotic sound.
rwl4|1 year ago
- https://github.com/DoMusic/Hybrid-Net
- https://github.com/TuneMusic/NiceMusic
- https://github.com/JoinMusic/fish
- https://github.com/Famuse/CombineNet
- https://github.com/AIAudioLab/AITabs
- https://github.com/AIMusicLab/MicroMuisc
I'm pretty sure there are more, but I'll stop there. Especially suspicious considering all the usernames.
Here's a post from yesterday on Reddit:
- https://www.reddit.com/r/coolaitools/comments/1ervthn/found_...
I'm guessing the general process here is:
- Push novelty (but unusable to most people) code to new Github repo
- Submit that code to Reddit/Hacker News
- People see it and are impressed by the novelty code, despite not running it due to missing the models themselves, etc. They upvote and subscribe ($$$) to actually try it.
- Repeat
I understand the desire to promote one's new service, and the product seems like it could be interesting, but this is not the way to get the word out. Reputation matters.
Edit:
Check out the user deeplover's post/comment history. One submission with the MicroMusic (see above) repo, and one comment, see below.
Also, the post by user liwei0517 is almost exactly like BigOrange688 on Reddit. See: https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1es0deh/co...
skeaker|1 year ago
sixall|1 year ago
HanClinto|1 year ago
crustaceansoup|1 year ago
sixall|1 year ago
rrherr|1 year ago
High-resolution guitar transcription via domain adaptation
Demo Videos: https://xavriley.github.io/HighResolutionGuitarTranscription... Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15258
> We propose the use of a high-resolution piano transcription model to train a new guitar transcription model. The resulting model obtains state-of-the-art transcription results on GuitarSet in a zero-shot context, improving on previously published methods.
bertili|1 year ago
MIDI Guitar 3 is in open beta testing [2] and adds MPE (multidimensional polyphonic expression) MIDI.
[1] jamorigin.com [2] jamorigin.com/beta
senbrow|1 year ago
kranner|1 year ago
edit: removed a reference to a competing product
LordShredda|1 year ago
criddell|1 year ago
A couple of weeks ago I asked one of the AIs to teach me this song. It responded that it can't teach specifics or tell me strumming patterns because it would be a copyright violation. I told it that if I went to a human teacher, they would have no problem teaching me how to play along to the song. That was a good enough argument to get the AI to changed its mind (whatever that means) and produced a chord chart and strumming pattern (which was wrong).
saaaaaam|1 year ago
Private performance of a composition is permitted under copyright law. Creating a mechanical copy and making a public performance requires a licence from a copyright owner and so without that licence there is, in the eyes of copyright law, a breach of copyright.
thekevan|1 year ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhjA2nvVD7U
authorfly|1 year ago
E.g. Bb instead of Ebmaj7
Bb7 instead of Bm7b5
neilyio|1 year ago
I only found out about https://www.soundslice.com recently. I'm not sure how it managed to evade me for years of searching for music resources on the internet... but for anyone interested in sheet music, I can't recommend it enough.
The design of the whole platform is so minimal and beautiful, and having notation synchronized with YouTube is simply brilliant. Built by one of the co-creators of Django, too!
adrianh|1 year ago
dadver|1 year ago
I tried making some AI covers, too, which was kind of fun. For one of my tries, I submitted Nirvana's Smells Like Teen Spirit for AI voice generation to make a cover of Carola's song "Främling" (Sweden's ESC song 1983 which came in third, a very non-Nirvana-type of song). At first, I thought the voice sounded pretty much like a Swedish Kurt Cobain, then the more I listened to it, all I could hear was the Swedish artist Nordman, and it dawned upon me that they have similar voice styles. I tried lowering the pitch, and then I was certain I recognised the voice from another artist but couldn't place it. So I'm leaning towards the AI voices being trained on some not-so-unfamiliar artists rather than there being some cool AI magic happening, though I'm out of my depth here.
sixall|1 year ago
buildsjets|1 year ago
SoftMachine|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
ksr|1 year ago
riiii|1 year ago
Anyone know of a thing that does?
daniel011|1 year ago
https://lamucal.com/chords/daniel-pal/blue-894793
hayley-patton|1 year ago
smrtinsert|1 year ago
TrackerFF|1 year ago
ndriscoll|1 year ago
zerop|1 year ago
bilater|1 year ago
CMLab|1 year ago
sixall|1 year ago
guitarlimeo|1 year ago
but was somewhat disappointed. The site is cool, can give you a headstart when transposing a song to practice, but the chords were quite off in a few examples I tried.
afpx|1 year ago
deeplover|1 year ago
[deleted]
yorwba|1 year ago
EAZR4400|1 year ago
[deleted]
joffendi|1 year ago
[deleted]
liwei0517|1 year ago
riiii|1 year ago
liwei0517|1 year ago
The mid-range is eerily close to Taylor's voice - there were moments when I almost thought it was really her singing. But, If you listen closely, you can still catch a tiny hint of that robotic sound.
A Bar Song : (Taylor Swift Cover) https://lamucal.com/ai-cover/song-share/66be244cbc3fdb000e76... Original: A Bar Song (Tipsy) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7bQwwqW-Hc