WingNews logo WingNews
top | item 41260460

(no title)

petschge | 1 year ago

How is that extortionate? Using the inflation calculator of the Bank of England that is 86 pounds now or $110. Admittedly that more expensive than the current price of $24 for the paper back, but at worst that seems to be twice as expensive as a common price for a 850 page book?

discuss

order

yial|1 year ago

At October, 1970, the provisional figures of average weekly earnings of full-time manual workers were £28 Os. 11d. for men aged 21 years and over, and £13 19s. 10d. for women aged 18 years and over. Between October, 1965 and October, 1970, average earnings of all workers covered by the regular inquiry rose by 45.9 per cent. and the general index of retail prices by 26.4 per cent. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1971/jan/...

So it would have been around a decent chunk of your weekly wage as an average worker, it sounds like. I think what we would need to know is how much excess income someone would have for something like that at the time.

gambiting|1 year ago

I cannot imagine paying £86 for any book tbh. That seems crazy high.

JonChesterfield|1 year ago

Consider that some technical books have a potential target audience of thousand or so people. Then ask how many hours the book needs to save you to be worth $100. Depending on the book that can look very cheap.

burkaman|1 year ago

Don't go to college, you'll have to do that 5 times every semester.

marcus_holmes|1 year ago

I think I paid similar for Wolfram's A New Kind of Science back in the early 00's. Huge great beast of a hardback tome, promising the secrets of the universe. I don't think I ever finished it, and ended up giving it away to a charity shop after schlepping it around the world with me, unread.

robocat|1 year ago

> twice as expensive as a common price for a 850 page book?

Costs per page have dropped significantly - so not valid to use page count as a fixed comparison point???

So perhaps its price is more reasonable than we might assume.