(no title)
trte9343r4 | 1 year ago
My point is that lighter attacks (scratches, jumping, sniffing, licking...) are so common, they can not even be reported.
If students have no cameras, many more teachers would bring their "pets" into school.
trte9343r4 | 1 year ago
My point is that lighter attacks (scratches, jumping, sniffing, licking...) are so common, they can not even be reported.
If students have no cameras, many more teachers would bring their "pets" into school.
JumpCrisscross|1 year ago
Sniffing and licking are not “attacks”. If they are, a car honking or braking suddenly is a crash.
> If students have no cameras, many more teachers would bring their "pets" into school
How many teachers brought pets to school before the 2000s? How many people brought pets to the office? (If anything, there are more pets at the workplace now than ever before.)
The taking of a cell phone seems to have emotionally provoked you. Reflecting on why you’re responding to a phone like a crack pipe might be a better use of your time than pretending to have a phobia of dog licks.
trte9343r4|1 year ago
[deleted]