top | item 41327821 (no title) redog | 1 year ago Nah, that's the sarcasterisk and should replace /s in modern communication. discuss order hn newest DonHopkins|1 year ago It also means three pointer dereferences in C++. ale42|1 year ago Looking forward to write such code: ⁂data = 42; load replies (1) account42|1 year ago Please submit a proposal for this. load replies (2) emmet|1 year ago Honestly explicit sarcasm indication should just die out entirely. Might as well be writing it longhand as "Just in case you missed it, this is a joke haha." every time you tell a joke. KMnO4|1 year ago I’m not sure if you’re being serious or not. I’ve never met you and tone isn’t conveyed over text.I’m assuming you’re joking, but maybe that’s exactly why we need explicit sarcasm demarcation. load replies (1) bmacho|1 year ago This reasoning is nonsensical.There is nothing to refute in it, but, just to prove it wrong: sarcasm is commonly denoted in spoken English by intonation. load replies (1)
DonHopkins|1 year ago It also means three pointer dereferences in C++. ale42|1 year ago Looking forward to write such code: ⁂data = 42; load replies (1) account42|1 year ago Please submit a proposal for this. load replies (2)
emmet|1 year ago Honestly explicit sarcasm indication should just die out entirely. Might as well be writing it longhand as "Just in case you missed it, this is a joke haha." every time you tell a joke. KMnO4|1 year ago I’m not sure if you’re being serious or not. I’ve never met you and tone isn’t conveyed over text.I’m assuming you’re joking, but maybe that’s exactly why we need explicit sarcasm demarcation. load replies (1) bmacho|1 year ago This reasoning is nonsensical.There is nothing to refute in it, but, just to prove it wrong: sarcasm is commonly denoted in spoken English by intonation. load replies (1)
KMnO4|1 year ago I’m not sure if you’re being serious or not. I’ve never met you and tone isn’t conveyed over text.I’m assuming you’re joking, but maybe that’s exactly why we need explicit sarcasm demarcation. load replies (1)
bmacho|1 year ago This reasoning is nonsensical.There is nothing to refute in it, but, just to prove it wrong: sarcasm is commonly denoted in spoken English by intonation. load replies (1)
DonHopkins|1 year ago
ale42|1 year ago
account42|1 year ago
emmet|1 year ago
KMnO4|1 year ago
I’m assuming you’re joking, but maybe that’s exactly why we need explicit sarcasm demarcation.
bmacho|1 year ago
There is nothing to refute in it, but, just to prove it wrong: sarcasm is commonly denoted in spoken English by intonation.