(no title)
Djdjur7373bb | 1 year ago
I've never tried one, but I assumed the level of bureaucracy must be similar in order to defend against fraud and fulfill regulatory requirements.
Djdjur7373bb | 1 year ago
I've never tried one, but I assumed the level of bureaucracy must be similar in order to defend against fraud and fulfill regulatory requirements.
ceejayoz|1 year ago
I can walk into my credit union's offices - they have just two branches - and talk to someone with decision making power. An actual human being picks up the phone if I call. Their customer service has been impeccable despite some complex asks.
I am unlikely to be able to do this if someone steals my crypto.
(My security question when calling in was once "you sent an email last week that made my boss very happy, what was it about?")
ethbr1|1 year ago
Cons of a credit union: many processes are still manually-controlled
There's a lot of scenarios where that's the lesser of two evils, though. And god it's nice to be able to walk into a branch, explain the situation to someone, and get "Let me see what I can do. There, all fixed" in reply.
Instead of "Oh, the system won't let me do that."
piperswe|1 year ago
This is a medium sized credit union, with a dozen or so branches.
unanimous|1 year ago
gopher_space|1 year ago
toast0|1 year ago
At that level of assets, you're usually not thousands of branches, it's probably just tens, and the organization is small enough to be based on empowering people to use their brains as opposed to strict script following and zero thinking.
Credit unions are a bit more flexible than a small bank though, because of shared branching. It's not as good as they say it is, but you can go to selected other credit union branches and get limited teller services.