I so badly wish they'd open-source Windows. It wasn't bad enough that they refuse to fix obviously bad code, but they also don't allow the very many talented performance engineers submit PRs that would do in a month what they couldn't get done in years.
lelanthran|1 year ago
Being open-source wouldn't fix things like that.
It'll be just like Gnome: PRs that fix UI gaffes wouldn't be accepted because "The Developers Know Better!"
OsrsNeedsf2P|1 year ago
supriyo-biswas|1 year ago
userbinator|1 year ago
If you're willing to ignore Imaginary Property laws, there are some very interesting chimeric OSes out there on the shadier parts of the Internet.
supriyo-biswas|1 year ago
Did you have something else in mind? Email is in my profile in case you have a link that you can share.
[1] https://www.ntlite.com
aap_|1 year ago
Idesmi|1 year ago
ilrwbwrkhv|1 year ago
ghssds|1 year ago
tlhunter|1 year ago
rty32|1 year ago
https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/14/24220138/microsoft-bitloc...
davkan|1 year ago
ksec|1 year ago
skissane|1 year ago
And the FAT filesystem driver: https://github.com/microsoft/Windows-driver-samples/tree/mai...
And also PowerShell: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell
And most of .NET: https://github.com/dotnet
Maybe they could consider an Apple-style approach: open source the core of the kernel and text-mode user space but leave the GUI closed.
Of course, open sourcing everything would be even better, but that might too big of a step for them. Open sourcing the non-GUI core could be a good initial step, whether or not it ends up going further.
chris_wot|1 year ago