top | item 41339399

(no title)

mark_and_sweep | 1 year ago

Reminds me of KQL (Kusto Query Language) by Microsoft

discuss

order

LeonB|1 year ago

Yeh, when I saw the example above I thought it was KQL.

But they do sort of acknowledge it in the paper. Eg on the first page it says:

> …we present a solution – adding pipe-structured data flow syntax to SQL. This makes SQL more flexible, extensible and easy to use. This paradigm works well in other languages like Kusto’s KQL[5]

Strange typo though, to say “Kusto’s KQL” instead of “Microsoft’s KQL”

Kusto is allegedly named after (sort of in reference to) Jacques Cousteau, so “Kusto’s” doesn’t make sense.

_huayra_|1 year ago

Does KQL still enforce no blank lines in the `let` clauses to the expression?

When I last used KQL, it was infuriating that I could create my `let` clauses in chunks separated by whitespace because a blank line would be considered a terminated statement (and Kusto would say "Hey where's your expression?!"). This meant every Kusto file was a sea of text with no clear differentiation between subsequent clauses. I ended up using 3 blank comment lines as a "fake empty line" just to maintain my sanity.

Again, hope they fixed that by now...