top | item 41350257

(no title)

MertsA | 1 year ago

Are you talking about Brian Steel? He was held in contempt because he refused to name his source that informed him of some misconduct by the judge (ex parte communication with a witness). That's hardly relevant here, the client wasn't involved at all as far as anyone knows.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Lawyertalk/comments/1dd32ji/brian_s...

discuss

order

themaninthedark|1 year ago

It was records and communication that the lawyer made on behalf of his client.

More interesting is why the judge and prosecutors have not been referred to the bar for their illegal actions.