top | item 41387457

(no title)

pasabagi | 1 year ago

No need to presume: you can read the article. "dissemination of defamatory fake news and another probe over possible obstruction, incitement and criminal organization."

Which is fair enough, I think.

discuss

order

EasyMark|1 year ago

Anyone who accuses X of hosting disinformation and fake news will 100% win in court. It’s at least 75%of the content I see when I dare to go to the “for you” algo feed.

matheusmoreira|1 year ago

"Disinformation and fake news" should not be crimes that anyone gets taken to court for to begin with.

Gud|1 year ago

Some blanket statements how X are bad is fair enough?

To be frank, this censorship and threats of censorship is much scarier than whatever X are doing.

cassianoleal|1 year ago

Obviously there's a lot more detail in all the prosecutions and investigations. Most, or all of it, should be publicly available if you really care to understand the problem.

Laws have been broken, and this is the justice system's reaction to that. This is not censorship. Brazil (and most of the world) don't subscribe to the idea that freedom of expression and freedom of press are unbound.