[spywaregorilla]

> 5. A negative view would be that AI coding assistants mean people don’t necessarily need “libraries” like this if an LLM can spit out the same results in a couple queries (rather than hunting around Github or the internet for pre-packaged code).

Why use a library when the LLM can spit of a unique reimplementation of the library logic every time you need it?

The future is terrifying.

[entropicdrifter]

People like having standards, that's why. They make processes more simply repeatable and experience more easily transferrable

[oriel]

A positive view would mean an uptick in library quality and sophistication, and a death-knell to the trend of shallow do-one-thing script wrapping libraries.

I've been doing similar mobile development with Godot, and have found the Phantom Camera library to be an example of a better developed and thought out library thats actually worth importing.

[lawlessone]

An LLM that just replies with an executable?