They're in the process of doing this for alums @hmc.edu too. Google baited us into moving the whole infrastructure into the cloud and now are switching us to something the alumni association can't afford.
Meanwhile, the self-hosted mail server for the CS department @cs.hmc.edu still hosts accounts for all the alumni and will for the foreseeable eternity. I can still SSH into the current department cluster and read two decade old (or two second old) emails using mutt. If their cluster somehow ever runs out of disks, I'm happy to donate a terabytes worth, but like hell I'm giving money to big-G for cloud storage.
There is no "they" - academic research labs are funded by their own grants, and are pretty close to being separate companies that just rent space from the university. BOINC is funded by donations and grants from the NSF and NASA.
Academic administration that makes decisions about things like e-mail account policies is an entirely different thing from research labs doing projects like BOINC, ultimately controlled by the state government- although it can and does choose to delegate some responsibilities to academic faculty.
Yup. They reduced our storage by a lot with no alternatives so far.
I was supposed to have just 10 GB of storage total. We complained, so at least now it's 30 GB. Still it's borderline low for me because of the kind of data we collect and collaborative work.
I'm looking for a solution in the mean time; trying to change my workflow.
It is sad IMO, yours may differ, that educational institutions, once among the pioneers of the internet, are now relying on an advertising company for something as basic as email.
The University of Oklahoma wiped out all alumni email accounts a couple of years ago (after explicitly promising they would be retained), regardless of data stored. Didn't affect me too much but it still struck me as an extremely shortsighted move - cut off contact with any professors or peers who only had your school address just to save on a couple of mail servers.
Same thing happened at UofMichigan. Luckily, they gave us 15gb and most of my storage over that was from photos, but i had 100s of gigs. So I had to scramble to move them all to an external harddrive using google takeout, which itself was a huge PITA, mainly because the UI is so horrible it required me to manually click download on every individual 5gb zip.
Once there is a payment, it's a business relationship. You don't want to enter a business relationship with an alumni who graduated many years ago that could be anywhere in the world doing anything, unless you can handle that. (Donations are different though, for whatever reason. It actually wouldn't be a bad idea to tie email storage with donations.)
Professors, staff and registered students etc, on the other hand, is easier to deal with.
Billing is hard. University IT pays for X amount of storage across their Google Workspace tenant. For edus, you get a 100TB pool and can buy more storage in 10TB increments. It's not metered per user either.
I'm worried about this happening at my alma mater.
Under protest by the people managing the service, the university administration switched from a locally hosted service to the microsoft suite.
Now that there's a (probably very large) line item in the bill from MS to support email for people who don't pay tuition, there's got to be pressure from the beancounters to just drop the perk.
TLDR: Google Workspace for Education rug pulled schools on their "unlimited" plans, and the deadline is coming up to avoid paying extra fees. This was communicated in advance, but maybe still a bit quick for a large institution
> From: (Jan 2023)
We currently store 12.4 PB of data across all Google services, and our new storage cap, without significant additional fees, is 1.9 PB.
See the timeline [1]. They have been forcing the rest of the university to reduce their usage. Finally it's time for alumni. There's no need for a fuss on HN about this. There's a lot more belt tightening across the university.
I'm not seeing the legitimate use for 5GB of email. Delete your attachments and it has to be fine. Annoying? Sure, but you can search email for large attachments. How bad could it be. I'm sure they follow a power law, so deleting a few of them should do it for "legitimate" over-quota users.
The default of a 100TB shared storage pool seems hilariously low for a university. It's not surprising why Google made that all. Students were probably storing TB of anime and whatever else on their drives. It was crazy when we looked at the storage usage at my uni.
Berkeley appears to offload email, calendar, and other services to Google workspace. A quick dig of MX records for Berkeley.edu show Google mail servers.
Google has been raising the rates of the workspace products every year it seems. I was originally using “G Suite” just for email and it used to cost $3-4/user/month. Now it’s costing me $7-8 per month on Google Workspace.
I suspect the provost or uni president cut the IT budget and this is an unfortunate result.
Well, there are some things, one is that no student at least after the first year should being so incapable to having such large maildirs on an uni provided email service, another is that in the USA it's not like in the EU, students pay, MUCH, so essentially they need to be treated as customers, not wannabe $something in a public service...
Oh yes. EDU emails are a hot commodity. And there have been a lot of crack downs lately on who can have them. The number of free and heavily discounted items you can get with them makes them quite valuable.
Having a .edu email can be very useful for getting access to academic information. Heck, I even used my alumni email to create a Facebook account way back when it was for universities only.
Back in my day, RPI used to have alum shell accounts, but they quickly got rid of those and then quickly moved to just forwarding the alum email address somewhere else. I have no idea what they do now, but the feeling is mutual at this point.
The correct thing to do is to send a 552 5.2.2 Mailbox full [0][1], not to delete the account. Email account quota is a standard feature of mail servers.
how about all alumni email addresses just become forward and reverse proxy relays. let me just add a forwarding address, and provide outbound mail.
permanent vanity addresses tied to accomplishments, clubs etc should be a straightforward business or product for google, microsoft, cloudflare etc to offer.
or patch dns to allow the sale of email addresses, and process all forwards (with the forwarding address stored privately) before processing other mx records.
Now I didn’t go to a fancy shmancy alt-ivy but there’s something kinda juvenile to me about using your school email address post your studies. Kinda like staying on your parents’ phone plan into your 30’s.
twbarr|1 year ago
Meanwhile, the self-hosted mail server for the CS department @cs.hmc.edu still hosts accounts for all the alumni and will for the foreseeable eternity. I can still SSH into the current department cluster and read two decade old (or two second old) emails using mutt. If their cluster somehow ever runs out of disks, I'm happy to donate a terabytes worth, but like hell I'm giving money to big-G for cloud storage.
perihelions|1 year ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Open_Infrastructure_f... ("Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing")
They are Kropotkin when you are volunteering for them, and neutron-bomb Jack Welch when you expect something of them.
UniverseHacker|1 year ago
Academic administration that makes decisions about things like e-mail account policies is an entirely different thing from research labs doing projects like BOINC, ultimately controlled by the state government- although it can and does choose to delegate some responsibilities to academic faculty.
hooverd|1 year ago
manav|1 year ago
kccqzy|1 year ago
pks016|1 year ago
I was supposed to have just 10 GB of storage total. We complained, so at least now it's 30 GB. Still it's borderline low for me because of the kind of data we collect and collaborative work.
I'm looking for a solution in the mean time; trying to change my workflow.
1vuio0pswjnm7|1 year ago
lostmsu|1 year ago
alephnerd|1 year ago
daemonologist|1 year ago
dzonga|1 year ago
shepherdjerred|1 year ago
rylittle|1 year ago
edm0nd|1 year ago
josh2600|1 year ago
rty32|1 year ago
Professors, staff and registered students etc, on the other hand, is easier to deal with.
hooverd|1 year ago
ronsor|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
nullhole|1 year ago
Under protest by the people managing the service, the university administration switched from a locally hosted service to the microsoft suite.
Now that there's a (probably very large) line item in the bill from MS to support email for people who don't pay tuition, there's got to be pressure from the beancounters to just drop the perk.
hooverd|1 year ago
bogwog|1 year ago
Alumnis beware of Microsoft
gaws|1 year ago
Yeah, your account's getting deleted. You should start backing up important emails now.
cheepin|1 year ago
TLDR: Google Workspace for Education rug pulled schools on their "unlimited" plans, and the deadline is coming up to avoid paying extra fees. This was communicated in advance, but maybe still a bit quick for a large institution
fn-mote|1 year ago
> From: (Jan 2023) We currently store 12.4 PB of data across all Google services, and our new storage cap, without significant additional fees, is 1.9 PB.
See the timeline [1]. They have been forcing the rest of the university to reduce their usage. Finally it's time for alumni. There's no need for a fuss on HN about this. There's a lot more belt tightening across the university.
I'm not seeing the legitimate use for 5GB of email. Delete your attachments and it has to be fine. Annoying? Sure, but you can search email for large attachments. How bad could it be. I'm sure they follow a power law, so deleting a few of them should do it for "legitimate" over-quota users.
[1]: https://bconnected.berkeley.edu/projects/google-cost-reducti...
hooverd|1 year ago
Here's the deets: https://bconnected.berkeley.edu/projects/google-cost-reducti...
xyst|1 year ago
Google has been raising the rates of the workspace products every year it seems. I was originally using “G Suite” just for email and it used to cost $3-4/user/month. Now it’s costing me $7-8 per month on Google Workspace.
I suspect the provost or uni president cut the IT budget and this is an unfortunate result.
kkfx|1 year ago
rr808|1 year ago
Petersipoi|1 year ago
munchler|1 year ago
spiritplumber|1 year ago
throw7|1 year ago
nullbyte808|1 year ago
samstave|1 year ago
(Although I think @berkeley.edu is likely the most famous .edu? (because of BSD and all the man pages?))
joelkevinjones|1 year ago
electriclove|1 year ago
layer8|1 year ago
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_SMTP_server_return_cod...
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3463.html#section-3.3
shepherdjerred|1 year ago
declan_roberts|1 year ago
Receiving but not sending seems like a nice enough compromise.
sshine|1 year ago
https://bofh.bjash.com/
wsdookadr|1 year ago
maybe this is a trend and should be used for all websites.
make small data great again?
basch|1 year ago
permanent vanity addresses tied to accomplishments, clubs etc should be a straightforward business or product for google, microsoft, cloudflare etc to offer.
or patch dns to allow the sale of email addresses, and process all forwards (with the forwarding address stored privately) before processing other mx records.
none of that should take up much storage.
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
JojoFatsani|1 year ago