[fjkdlsjflkds]

The lack of semantics associated to DC (and near-DC) components in audio data is important, and a big difference compared to image data, no doubt.

I'm not sure this changes if you look at a cepstral representation (as suggested in the article). In this case, the DC component represents the (white) noise level in the raw audio space (i.e., the spectrum averaged over all frequencies), so it doesn't have strong semantics either (other than... "how noisy is the waveform?").