(no title)
frogblast | 1 year ago
But in general, this isn't really much new. If you have home cameras, and police can obtain a search warrant, then you can be compelled to provide the video, or they can seize any device (such as entire computer, your server closet, etc) that could reasonably contain the video.
bastawhiz|1 year ago
Yes but the police can't start occupying my house or deny me access to it because I wasn't home to let them in.
frogblast|1 year ago
With a search warrant, they can. You can be kept out of your home until they complete the search and seizing of the items named in the warrant. Depending on what is being searched for (excavating your basement looking for bodies?) that could take quite some time.
So the Tesla situation getting press isn't because the precedent is new, it's because most Americans (many in this thread included) don't understand what the law has already been since long before Teslas ever existed, and are surprised at what they find.
uoaei|1 year ago
That would require a search warrant, something the comment you're replying to already mentioned. Search warrants typically specify the means of access.
JohnFen|1 year ago
I would have thought this was the path of least resistance (as well as doing less harm to the car owner) since they're getting a search warrant anyway.
frogblast|1 year ago
But if that doesn't work, then preserving evidence is considered to be very important. For example, it would be a problem if the car owner deleted the video.