[portpecos]

>This is ridiculously complex, and thinking you can encode every possible eventuality in law or code is frankly not a serious suggestion.

This actually sounds interesting and I would be down to help pull off such a Herculean task.

[auggierose]

I think the point is that this is neither possible, nor is it sensible. Machine systems supervising humans is not human, it is Skynet.

[TeMPOraL]

I mean yes, it'd be a safe job to have for decades. You could get paid literally doing nothing.

But also no, this is lunacy. Not only 'itake would like to strip people of their autonomy, they'd also like to strip them from their capacity to do good? That's wishing us a fate worse than death.

Not that it's possible in practice anyway. It's a AGI-complete problem, and any lesser attempts are... well wake me up when any software system implements exceptions and slack around their rigid rules.