top | item 41455709 (no title) MalcolmDwyer | 1 year ago It's also not "CSS only". discuss order hn newest knodi123|1 year ago is it not? Because of the @keyframes rule?https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@keyframes extra88|1 year ago I think they're saying because the technique requires adding a second copy of the content in HTML, it's not "CSS-only."For the pedants, they could change the title to "No-JS infinite scrolling carousel animation."
knodi123|1 year ago is it not? Because of the @keyframes rule?https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@keyframes extra88|1 year ago I think they're saying because the technique requires adding a second copy of the content in HTML, it's not "CSS-only."For the pedants, they could change the title to "No-JS infinite scrolling carousel animation."
extra88|1 year ago I think they're saying because the technique requires adding a second copy of the content in HTML, it's not "CSS-only."For the pedants, they could change the title to "No-JS infinite scrolling carousel animation."
knodi123|1 year ago
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@keyframes
extra88|1 year ago
For the pedants, they could change the title to "No-JS infinite scrolling carousel animation."