(no title)
ravjo
|
1 year ago
To add some context: the astronauts are not "stranded" in space. They are in the international space station. They were supposed to get back on this capsule after a few days stay, but they are now expected to stay in the ISS and get back only in February on SpaceX capsule/vehicle.
creativeSlumber|1 year ago
thegrim33|1 year ago
jmyeet|1 year ago
That's like saying that after 9/11 when all flights were grounded and you, as a New Yorker, weren't "stranded" in London because, hey, you could always row a boat back. It's such a weird and meaningless semantic defense.
Why are you defending Boeing here?
ravjo|1 year ago
Vecr|1 year ago
ravjo|1 year ago
wmf|1 year ago
mrjin|1 year ago
givinguflac|1 year ago
lupusreal|1 year ago
[deleted]
KyleBerezin|1 year ago
If you are stranded on an island, it implies you have no means of return. They have a means, to return on the same capsule. They also could return on another capsule. NASA decided to not take the risk, as there are other less risky options available.
If there were no other options, NASA would send the back on Starliner, and it would still likely be much safer than something like the space shuttle
wannacboatmovie|1 year ago
Sorry to hear your privileged existence never had to rent a car last minute and drive 13 hours, Steve Martin and John Candy style. Because I certainly have.