top | item 41479671 (no title) intern4tional | 1 year ago He was freed in 2020: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/02/man-who-refused-... discuss order hn newest fl0id|1 year ago There’s a comment on that later article that surely he would be charged for real on the existing evidence. But at least google turned up nothing. xtiansimon|1 year ago “Of course, the contents of the hard drive might incriminate Rawls, but the contents of the hard drive are not considered testimony for Fifth Amendment purposes.”Huh
fl0id|1 year ago There’s a comment on that later article that surely he would be charged for real on the existing evidence. But at least google turned up nothing.
xtiansimon|1 year ago “Of course, the contents of the hard drive might incriminate Rawls, but the contents of the hard drive are not considered testimony for Fifth Amendment purposes.”Huh
fl0id|1 year ago
xtiansimon|1 year ago
Huh