(no title)
skyfaller | 1 year ago
But I would pay if I had to, and I am considering paying for a GoToSocial server to experiment with an allowlist network:
https://codeberg.org/oliphant/islands/src/branch/main/ion
My server: https://jawns.club
Our finances: https://opencollective.com/jawnsclub
We're currently paying for managed Mastodon hosting on https://masto.host/
rglullis|1 year ago
skyfaller|1 year ago
Finally, I think pay what you want is better so long as it works, since it doesn't exclude people who don't have money, but do contribute to the community in other ways. The only real reason to move away from pay what you want is if it doesn't pay the bills, and our finances are fine for now.
I can see a place for mandatory payments if you're providing extra services at a steeper price, such as paid moderation, but I think the number of people willing to pay what moderation at a living wage actually costs... is rather small. Perhaps if we made moderation more efficient, e.g. sharing moderation decisions between servers, paid moderation could become more affordable by splitting the cost between more users, but there are several problems with that approach... one being that moderation by members of your community is always going to be more clueful than moderation from outside your community.