[econcon]

unless you collude with other companies, doesn't seem like it is.

[willseth]

That is the entire basis for the RealPage lawsuit. The point is that if the effect on pricing is indistinguishable from price fixing, it doesn't matter if the act of colluding is abstracted into and laundered through a 3rd party with an algorithmic system responsible for setting prices.

[CRConrad]

As this guy argues, that this is also price fixing by algorithm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFk8V7mU0Wo .

(Got the link from a comment on another recent HN post, IIRC.)

[ambicapter]

Honestly, I think it does still matter. The basis for the RealPage lawsuit seems to be that people inside and outside the company glibly considered it price-fixing, and said it out loud to each other. The didn't really seem to make the case that it was "algorithmic price-fixing" (Disclaimer: not a lawyer). You can only argue in court about existing laws, so until algorithmic price-fixing is written in the law books (or settled case law) you're gonna have a tough time bringing that up to a judge.

[theGnuMe]

unless disclosed to employees and applicants this seems like de facto colluding.

I always ask myself, as to the legality or ethics, would this survive review by a jury of my peers...

[fastball]

You think it is more ethical for wage data to be kept secret? Why? Rarely is requiring secrecy the more ethical option.