(no title)
niles | 1 year ago
It seems like this is a tool that "if you could read all the news of today, what would your gut tell you", and that is helpful but not thorough.
For example, can you apply the cureent reasoning to news articles from previous time periods and use the prediction on a past result. Would your prediction be accurate? If no, maybe re-reason.
https://aipredict.fun/prediction/1074cf90-c818-44fd-be0b-c00...
user052919|1 year ago
You're right that we're limited in how much news we can pull. Generally, we can only look about 90 days into the past for news articles.
I'd definitely like to expand the corpus of information that we can pull from. Getting access to reliable historical data is high on that list, as it will dramatically improve base rate estimation.
niles|1 year ago
I kinda feels like you are using the LLM to assign "weights" or important properties of an algo and then directly translating the basic arithmetic accounting of those factors into a prediction. What I expect is that the LLM would also be used to read all past news to find similar patterns and then create time slices where its weights could be tested against a control. It can then backtest its own weights to better tune what factors really led to an outcome and expose this refinement as part of the prediction.
News Data Sources: https://www.gdeltproject.org/ https://credibilitycoalition.org https://data.worldbank.org/