[13of40]

Not sure I'm totally understanding here, but it sounds like LinkedIn turned on (probably AI-based) porn scanning on messages, there was a false positive, and the guy wasn't able to escalate to support. Is there an implication that it was blocked for political reasons?

[totetsu]

It’s not porn, it’s mixed use technology. The persons decentralized LORA radio messaging platform, is another persons disaster resilience platform, is another persons hobby project, is another persons anti censorship tool, is another persons improvised frontline communications tool, is another persons counter-terrorism ai ban hammer trigger.

[seszett]

LinkedIn's message is:

> Message removed for adult nudity and sexual activity

[kybernetyk]

>It’s not porn, it’s mixed use technology.

Edge/edging ... of course it's a porn flag.

[MuffinFlavored]

People send each other porn on LinkedIn?

[makeitdouble]

Actually, why wouldn't people working in porn and porn adjacent industries send porn related content to each other in DMs, totally in a professional context ?

[BadHumans]

If a program has a messaging system, it will be used to send porn.

[chillfox]

Based on the number of guys who think LinkedIn is a dating site I don't see why there wouldn't be people who think it's a porn sharing site.

[duskwuff]

Given how many people are on LinkedIn, would you doubt that women on the platform sometimes get sexually harassed in DMs, e.g. by people sending them porn?

[fknorangesite]

> send each other

I imagine it's a lot more uni-directional.

Where there is a messaging platform, there are unsolicited dick pics.