The real question is whether is whether it is right for the judges of a country to block access to a service that the countries depend on.
For instance in the UK the government can stop local media from publishing news that is considered libellous or defamatory, or may unjustly influence court cases, but they can't stop citizens from accessing that information if it is published in a news outlet outside the country.
No one is questioning why the Brazilian judiciary should have that power. It seems rather excessive and an infringement of Brazilians rights, though that is not surprising when we live in a era when governments have taking upon themselves to decide what their citizens rights are, when human rights are supposed to be intrinsic, ie those that all fauna on the planet do.
Sure, it makes technically harder to block.. But governments don't rely only technical solutions for problems..
China, like Brazil is doing, would order Cloudflare to block Twitter and they would have to choose either comply and help China block it, like they are doing in Brazil, or challenge and not comply and face the consequences and likely a full block..
Having Cloudflare fully blocked in both countries would be terrible for business as they have many other customers so it is economically best to comply and potentially loose one customer then challenge the order and loose the entire market..
We really need to avoid a future where censorship is regarded as a virtue and monopolized transit providers are "cancelled" or shamed into being the judge/jury/executioner.
The far better solution is just to ignore stuff you don't agree with, go outside, and move on with life.
Google Ads took Twitter on, too. Google now delivers ads directly into Twitter that /sort of/ look like tweets, but just off enough to tell they’re ads. The “Why this ad” sends you off to Google.
jrflowers|1 year ago
https://noticias.uol.com.br/colunas/andreza-matais/2024/09/1...
profpaz|1 year ago
[deleted]
tuyuri|1 year ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41406367
vfclists|1 year ago
For instance in the UK the government can stop local media from publishing news that is considered libellous or defamatory, or may unjustly influence court cases, but they can't stop citizens from accessing that information if it is published in a news outlet outside the country.
No one is questioning why the Brazilian judiciary should have that power. It seems rather excessive and an infringement of Brazilians rights, though that is not surprising when we live in a era when governments have taking upon themselves to decide what their citizens rights are, when human rights are supposed to be intrinsic, ie those that all fauna on the planet do.
goofed|1 year ago
Actually, millions of people are, and senators are seeking this judge's impeachment.
PauloManrique|1 year ago
That's the point, they don't. There's nothing in the law for him to back his decisions. But we just hope for our senate to take action.
13415|1 year ago
more_corn|1 year ago
kingofthehill98|1 year ago
goofed|1 year ago
tmottabr|1 year ago
Sure, it makes technically harder to block.. But governments don't rely only technical solutions for problems..
China, like Brazil is doing, would order Cloudflare to block Twitter and they would have to choose either comply and help China block it, like they are doing in Brazil, or challenge and not comply and face the consequences and likely a full block..
Having Cloudflare fully blocked in both countries would be terrible for business as they have many other customers so it is economically best to comply and potentially loose one customer then challenge the order and loose the entire market..
PauloManrique|1 year ago
readyplayernull|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
KomoD|1 year ago
kingofthehill98|1 year ago
Blocking Cloudflare itself wouldn't make any sense as our country systems themselves would get hurt and I don't think Cloudflare will deny such order.
ChrisArchitect|1 year ago
phoe-krk|1 year ago
CLiED|1 year ago
goofed|1 year ago
pjmlp|1 year ago
diegoholiveira|1 year ago
exabrial|1 year ago
The far better solution is just to ignore stuff you don't agree with, go outside, and move on with life.
Barracoon|1 year ago
kotaKat|1 year ago
KTibow|1 year ago
Tohhou|1 year ago
[deleted]