(no title)
jellicle | 1 year ago
Discussions of sovereign debts as if they were the same as debts owed by individuals are laughable.
The stated actions planned by Labour (generally impoverishing the populace and slowing the economy) will have the effect of increasing the notional indebtedness of the UK, not decreasing it.
s1artibartfast|1 year ago
Debt is not inherently good for an economy or country. It can be good if it is invested wisely with positive ROI exceeding the cost of borrowing. Borrowing for negative ROI obviously impoverishes the future for the benefit of today.
jellicle|1 year ago
Well, that's not in evidence here. There is maybe one commenter total in this thread other than myself who is NOT commenting as if these are real debts, that cannot be paid off since "the UK is broke" and will somehow cause the UK to be bankrupted or harassed by debt collectors.
> It can be good if it is invested wisely with positive ROI exceeding the cost of borrowing. Borrowing for negative ROI obviously impoverishes the future for the benefit of today.
Even this is a misunderstanding of sovereign debt. The UK can pay off all its debts by tea time. The cost of borrowing can therefore be $0. The UK is choosing to make payments to debt-holders for various reasons but none of them are "we need the money to make investments and this is the only way to get it, making payments to debt-holders". The UK does not need to borrow in order to spend.
tonyedgecombe|1 year ago
Also Labour has a better track record on balancing the budget than the Tories.
Iulioh|1 year ago
The UK, which creates UK pounds, can pay off these UK pound debts any time it likes
____
The most important currency a country have is trust, this would cost way more trust than money.
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]