(no title)
Meganet | 1 year ago
But not with a Mac Studio: You can build your 8k super trible all bells and whistles with a lot less money than giving it to apple. The difference is volumne. A Mac Studio is probably 5-10x smaller.
The point is still valid: You do pay a big price for these chips. Apple pushes you to a Mac Book Pro due to RAM.
Its not bad critisism, don't get me wrong. My company laptop is really good but it costs 3k.
The normal consumer market, outside of an Apple ecosystem high price bubble, actually starts a lot lower. YOu can get a normal laptop for 300 while the MacBook Air starts at 1000.
But before the M chip, this was totally different. I would now try to convince people 'if you can afford it, save uup a little bit more and get you an macbook air' i would not have said this a few years back.
acdha|1 year ago
That $300 “normal” laptop was worse in almost every way and had significantly shorter service life - I still remember people making those comparisons claiming spinning metal drives were the same as SSDs. What you’re conflating is that there isn’t a single market segment but several, and Apple relies on used kit for the lower end price points. When you compare equivalent hardware capabilities, things have been roughly even since the switch to Intel, although it got tricky during the end of that when Intel struggled to ship low-power parts and you really had to decide how much you valued battery life.
Meganet|1 year ago
Smartphones helped here a lot though but are not always an alternative. A young person barly making enough for studing (a person who needs a keyboard).