top | item 41632234

(no title)

_hmry | 1 year ago

There's possible context (unknown veracity) from this comment 2 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41614406

discuss

order

cldellow|1 year ago

I don't use WP Engine or WordPress, so I don't have a side in this fight.

As an outsider, that context seems a bit dubious to me.

@photomatt has tweeted [5135]: "[...] Please let me know if any employee faces firing or retaliation for speaking up about their company's participation (or lack thereof) in WordPress. We'll make sure it's a big public deal and that you get support. [...]"

If this was true, I would think that @photomatt's twitter feed would be loudly boosting this disgruntled employee's story of WP Engine-imposed limits and subsequent retaliation. Yet @photomatt's twitter feeds seems silent to me. This makes me skeptical of this context.

[5135]: https://x.com/photomatt/status/1836862087320195174

mthoms|1 year ago

Meanwhile, right now over on Reddit there are WordPress Core developers posting about this anonymously for fear of retaliation from Matt.

He has... a bit of reputation.

ufmace|1 year ago

That, and the whole thing about Matt M going on a scathing rant about how bad WPEngine supposedly is[0], supposedly because they don't support WP page revision control as well as he'd like. Seems a bit over-the-top and breathless to me.

I figure the whole thing is a corporate whine-fest over who makes more money from actually hosting Wordpress sites.

[0] https://wordpress.org/news/2024/09/wp-engine/

x0x0|1 year ago

Seems unlikely though? Matt wrote a post on the web, ie he had unlimited length available to him. If the dispute is over employee contributions, then he should have made that the focus of his complaint.