[irisgrunn]

Probably.

However impressive LLMs are, they're not AGI.

For example this morning even, I was working together with a coworker and he used ChatGPT to ask for some examples. Unfortunately they didn't work, after reading the actual documentation it turned out that the structure had to be slightly different.

This is the impression I get from everything that has been generated with "AI", on the face it looks great, but as soon as you start going into detail it's not right or just plainly wrong. The generated code had six fingers. They might be able to improve this eventually but I don't think it will ever be fixed because of the nature of LLMs.

[visarga]

Have you pasted the documentation or asked it to search for recent docs on the task at hand? If not, you're using it wrong.

[spacemadness]

“You’re holding it wrong” strikes again.

[BriggyDwiggs42]

This is usually not the problem